Comments for Linking research & learning technologies through standards

Comment on Learner Identity by uldm

uldm — Thu, 21 Mar 2013 22:14:57 +0000

The blog is just on wordpress. The link in the article is on a government website and you would be best to follow up with them re hosting as this blog article goes back a few years now

Comment on Learner Identity by dinero online encuestas

dinero online encuestas — Thu, 21 Mar 2013 14:44:39 +0000

Hello would you mind letting me know which hosting company you’re using? I’ve loaded your blog
in 3 completely different internet browsers and I must say this blog loads a lot
faster then most. Can you suggest a good hosting provider at a
fair price? Thanks a lot, I appreciate it!

Comment on Reflections upon Technical Standards and Interoperability by Bonginkosi

Bonginkosi — Sat, 09 Jun 2012 16:37:58 +0000

I simply want to say I am just beneingr to blogs and really liked your page. Most likely I’m want to bookmark your site . You surely have very good articles. Many thanks for sharing with us your website page.

Comment on Verifying Learner Attainment Data by Dylan

Dylan — Sat, 09 Jun 2012 12:50:41 +0000

Neat blog! Is your theme custom made or did you dlwnooad it from somewhere? A theme like yours with a few simple tweeks would really make my blog shine. Please let me know where you got your design. Thank you

Comment on Piloting machine-readable curriculum by Hilton

Hilton — Sat, 09 Jun 2012 09:04:43 +0000

I guess that is true but also from what I have seen from Brian and as you state, he is one smart dude and I would prefer to have a csuotm solution by him anyday over a non-flexible yet finished product from MM. But that is just me On another note, i’m sure that if a developer is creating a product very similar to breeze live then they will be in competition, but there are already a bunch of interactive power-point type applications out there. If I were a developer I would not create such a product today, even if Breeze Live didn’t exist. I can’t remember the names but I saw 3 out there already during Flash Forward.

Comment on Position Paper: ADL Learning Content Registries and Repositories Summit by peocomparison

peocomparison — Wed, 18 Jan 2012 09:38:10 +0000

http://www.idoc-tlc.com/idoc/index.aspx
Nice information.

Comment on Approaches to fluid identity: Identifier Assertion Hubs by Arjay

Arjay — Thu, 12 Jan 2012 20:06:54 +0000

IMHO you\’ve got the right asnwer!

Comment on IMS Global Meeting: Learner Information Services by IMS Quarterly Meeting, August 2010 « Linking research & learning technologies through standards

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 02:02:16 +0000

[...] of standards, innovation, best practice and recognition of superior learning impact. IMS holds quarterly meetings for members and recently held its third quarterly meeting for 2010. Key topics on the agenda [...]

Comment on Evaluating our experiences with the IMS Common Cartridge specification by 21 Century Curriculum Content activity finalised « Linking research & learning technologies through standards

Thu, 08 Jul 2010 03:04:20 +0000

[...] activity investigated a relatively new IMS specification called Common Cartridge, as explained in a previous blog post. A survey was also undertaken with focus group members, and the following technical challenges were [...]

Comment on Position Paper: ADL Learning Content Registries and Repositories Summit by Learning Content Discovery & Exchange: Activity Summary « Linking research & learning technologies through standards

Wed, 30 Jun 2010 02:01:40 +0000

[...] Trust Federations in the VET sectorISO 2146 releasedADL Registries and Repositories Summit: reportPosition Paper: ADL Learning Content Registries and Repositories SummitNational Curriculum, machine-readableE-learning registry description through [...]